Monday, January 16, 2012

Writing our own success.

Sketchbooks - perhaps the ultimate home-books?

This post was inspired by the success of my friend and fellow blogger, who was recently shortlisted for the Times / Chicken House children's fiction competition. Last week, an exert from her novel, The Tarney Scalp, was published in the Times online. The eventual winner will receive a worldwide publishing contract, a substantial advance on royalties and representation by a literary agent.

That sort of prize is an aspiring writers dream. And with over 2000 entries, reaching the final stages of the competition is an achievement in itself. If there's any justice the shortlisted candidates will also be picked up by agents and publishers. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for Zoe, because a win on that scale needs a little luck as well as talent.

But talking to her about the competition got me thinking about the dangers of writers defining success too narrowly. I don't know if one in two thousand is the usual ratio of novels making the grade, but I'd bet it's not far off. Okay, so a lot of those will be trash, but anyone who mixes with committed writers will be aware of the angst, and at times despair, of those seeking a publisher.

Economists would say it's a question of supply and demand. They might concede an inefficiency in the way the market identifies talent, but I doubt they'd offer an alternative. For economic analysis is bound by the constraints of the publishing model - take away the traditional values and what basis do they have for measuring success?  Maybe that's why predictions about the growth of the Internet and e-books have been so amiss.

I'm not suggesting we lay any blame at publisher's doors - writers often gripe at the process, but it's not them stumping up the money for production and promotion. Rather, I'd advocate we should be more open minded about what constitutes success. If it's ultimately about reaching readers, then there are lots of other ways to achieve that - and you'll not be surprised that blogs are high on my list.

If you're reading this and thinking 'yeah yeah, but real books are better,' then I'd agree for some formats that's correct (novels especially) - but if you consider most poetry books do well to sell a few hundred copies, you might see my point differently. I know blogs which have that readership daily. I know too of blogs writers who have gone on to write for websites, magazines, newspapers and ultimately, yes books.

Print on demand and e-books have also made self-publishing a cheaper option - and less of a 'vanity' than was considered a few years ago. It is significant to me that when I was a painter I never met an artist who looked down on someone who organised their own show - and yet with writers, it seems that anything less than a fully funded contract from Harper Collins (or Chicken House) can be sneered at. This exaggerates of course, but writers have not always helped there own cause here.

I'm also a great fan of home books. My father in law has written (by hand) a ten year diary of his visits to Pembrokeshire, complete with sketches, cartoons, funny anecdotes, lists of oddities, quizzes... We love it, and it will no doubt be a family heirloom for generations. I have printed my blog for much the same reason, and it's surprising how may guests will pick it up and say they wish they'd written or collated an equivalent.

Pondering all this reminded me of the time I was involved with Welsh Canoe Association. The Sports Council when administering its annual grants, would always ask for evidence of success - and I would  point to the thousands of people participating in the sport. That's not what we we mean they would say - we need to see Olympic and Commonwealth medals. When, one year, I asked 'why' they wanted these medals, they became a little flummoxed - until eventually one of the panel said 'because it encourages people to particip...'  Aware of the circularity of this argument he tailed off under the glare of his Chairman.

To be fair Sports Council gave us the grant we'd asked for - but I like to think that I helped them see success a little differently. For if we define it only terms of the 'elite' - whether that be in sport or in writing - then frankly, most of us, are setting ourselves up to fail.

10 comments:

  1. Hello Mark:
    Congratulations to your friend Zoe!! As you say, she has achieved enormous success already but we do wish her well for the final stages of the award.

    And, what a minefield it is to measure success. Perhaps this is true for so many areas of the Arts? One does feel that in these stringent times, commercial factors are the overriding ones in determining who or what shall be published. This is not only limiting for all concerned, readers and writers alike, but is certainly very depressing for those trying to make their first steps in the literary world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you entirely Mark re, the different ways of publishing and how success is only (seriously) measured the one way for writers. I love blogging and reading blogs, especially yours which is always thought provoking. I think print on demand and e-books are going to be the thing of the future though real books will never die.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A great post...You've given me some food for thought as well. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Success, for me, is less about what others think and more about me doing something that I wasn't sure I could do.

    Congratulations to Zoe...that is one hell of an achievement and I shall keep my fingers crossed she goes all the way :-)

    C x

    ReplyDelete
  5. Delighted for Zoe.

    I wonder if e publishing is going to be the equivalent of the old public libraries...where you could drop onto a totally new field while browsing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Congratulations to Zoe. A wonderful achievement to have got so far. A friend's son has only published his SF novels as e-books, but has garnered lots of good reviews on Amazon on both sides of the Atlantic. Certainly one avenue for now as well as the future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You have started so many thoughts running here. I am intrigued by how blogging has opened up the world. I read so many blogs which are for me more interesting, arresting and real than conventionally much published work and they keep me coming back and back again. I think one result of the time which is now spent in reading blogs is that I read fewer magazines and print journalism (once a week perhaps instead of every day) and less fiction (fiction has to be great to keep me from the truth of insights into other lives). It is all on the shift. Great time to be alive and reading!

    ReplyDelete
  8. perhaps it is this immediate aspect of blogging that provides the attraction of it..... also blogs generally are , short, to the point, immediate and generally satisfying..... perhaps they can also be termed somewhat lazy..... but I think not....
    books and blogs......apples and oranges!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have - just - submitted my book to an agent with the hope of eventual publication, but I know that it is a minefield out there. A huge amount of luck, combined with skill, is required.
    I am steeling myself for multiple rejections (as for JK Rowling and others!), but I will keep telling myself that my 'success' is not the printed book but the fact that I have written it. It will always be available to my children and family, and perhaps that is success enough.
    (But I'd quite like JKR's success too!!)

    ReplyDelete
  10. The only trouble with self publishing is the lack of any editing process. Some people can self edit very well, but unfortunately many years of reading SF fan fiction can demonstrate only too well the range of good, bad and all stages in between of the writing. Looking at some of the cheap and free eBooks makes me wonder if some of the authors have any idea about spelling, grammar, plot development etc etc etc. It is finding the wheat in the chaff which poses the problem. Brilliant for Zoe though!

    ReplyDelete